In this regard, Member States are asked to make a separated table for each judgement and each probation decision, entering into the scope of the Framework Decision and indicate for each one the following information.
Name of the judgement or the probation decision |
Próbára bocsátás (conditional sentence) |
Classification of this judgement or the probation decision |
conditional sentence |
Legal basis of this judgement or the probation decision |
Sections 72-73 of the Criminal Code |
Definition of this judgement or the probation decision |
According to the definition of the CC: |
Legal Conditions of this judgement or the probation decision |
According to further provisions concerning conditional sentence, Section 72 (4)-(5) : The term of probation may be between one year to three years; the duration shall be determined in years. As a general rule, these provisions on conditional sentence may concern every kind of offences (provided that the legal conditions exist), and the consent of the person concerned is not needed for taking the decision on conditional sentence. |
Type of probation measures |
Section 72 (6) CC provides that the person on probation may be put under the supervision of a probation officer. If the person on probation is a recidivist, he must be placed under the supervision of a probation officer. It is the court that makes the decision on supervision of a probation officer. The decision of the court may include specific rules of conduct to prescribe obligations and prohibitions with a view to the objectives of the probation. For Section 82 (5) CC, please see that is written concerning suspended sentence. |
Combination of sanctions or measures |
According to the Hungarian law, conditional sentence (probation) is a criminal measure. Confiscation and supervision of a probation officer (as mentioned above) may be applied in addition to a conditional sentence. |
Authority responsible for taking such a decision |
It is the court that has conducted the criminal proceeding. |
Authority responsible for supervising |
Section 82 (1) CC: A person may be placed under the supervision of a probation officer for the duration of probation, if it is deemed necessary to follow the offender with attention regularly in order that the duration of probation passes successfully. It is the Probation Service that is responsible for the supervision of the probation measures during the time of probation. In Hungary, the Probation Service operates within the Central Office of Justice. According to Decree No. 17/2003 (VI. 24.) on Probation Service, section 20 and 24 : Tasks of the Probation Service: |
Authority responsible in case of infringement |
The court. According to Section 73 (1)-(2): |
Name of the judgement or the probation decision |
Feltételes szabadságra bocsátás (conditional release) |
Classification of this judgement or the probation decision |
Conditional release |
Legal basis of this judgement or the probation decision |
Articles 47-48/A of the Criminal Code |
Definition of this judgement or the probation decision |
Section 47 (1)-(2) provides: The court may release the convicted person serving a definitive term of imprisonment on parole, if there is substantial reason to believe - in view of the person's good conduct displayed when serving a term of imprisonment and of his willingness to lead the life of a law abiding citizen - that the aim of the punishment may also be achieved without further imprisonment. |
Legal Conditions of this judgement or the probation decision |
Please see the previous answer. Section 47/A. Section 48 (1) |
Type of probation measures |
Section 48 (3) It is the court that makes the decision on supervision of a probation officer. The decision of the court may include specific rules of conduct to prescribe obligations and prohibitions with a view to the objectives of the probation. For Section 82 (5) CC, please see that is written concerning suspended sentence. |
Combination of sanctions or measures |
Please see that is written concerning suspended sentence. |
Authority responsible for taking such a decision |
According to the Act of execution of punishments and criminal measures (Act 11 of 1979), it is the corrections judge who makes the decision on releasing on parole after the presentation of the penal institution and after the hearing of the convicted person, but before the possible date of the parole (Section 8). |
Authority responsible for supervising |
Section 82 (1) CC: A person may be placed under the supervision of a probation officer: for the duration of parole, if it is deemed necessary to follow the offender with attention regularly in order that the duration of parole passes successfully. According to Decree No. 17/2003 (VI. 24.) on Probation Service: Tasks of the Probation Service: |
Authority responsible in case of infringement |
The corrections judge. Section 48 (4) |
Name of the judgement or the probation decision |
Közérdeku munka |
Classification of this judgement or the probation decision |
Alternative sanction |
Legal basis of this judgement or the probation decision |
Articles 49-50 of the Criminal Code |
Definition of this judgement or the probation decision |
Article 49. |
Legal Conditions of this judgement or the probation decision |
Article 49. |
Type of probation measures |
Not applicable. |
Combination of sanctions or measures |
Please see that is written concerning suspended sentence. |
Authority responsible for taking such a decision |
The court, that has conducted the proceeding, may impose community service work in its judgment. |
Authority responsible for supervising |
According to Section 63 of the Act 11 of 1979 on the execution of punishments and criminal measures: |
Authority responsible in case of infringement |
The corrections judge. Section 50 (1)-(2) CC |
Name of the judgement or the probation decision |
Jármuvezetéstol eltiltás |
Classification of this judgement or the probation decision |
Alternative sanction |
Legal basis of this judgement or the probation decision |
Section 58-59 of the Criminal Code |
Definition of this judgement or the probation decision |
Section 58. |
Legal Conditions of this judgement or the probation decision |
Section 59. |
Type of probation measures |
Not applicable. |
Combination of sanctions or measures |
Please see that is written in case of community service work. |
Authority responsible for taking such a decision |
The court. |
Authority responsible for supervising |
According to the regulation of the Act 11 of 1979: |
Authority responsible in case of infringement |
According to Government Decree 218/1999 (XII. 28.) on certain administrative offences: Section 47. Any person who drives a motor vehicle without official licence or who lets another person drive a motor vehicle without an official licence, he/she commits an administrative offence and punishable by fine up to 100.000 HUF. The responsible authorities in case of infringement are the notary and the police. |
Name of the judgement or the probation decision |
Kitiltás |
Classification of this judgement or the probation decision |
Alternative sanction |
Legal basis of this judgement or the probation decision |
Section 64 of the Criminal Code |
Definition of this judgement or the probation decision |
Section 64. |
Legal Conditions of this judgement or the probation decision |
Please see the answer above. In addition, Section 64 (2) CC provides, that the shortest duration of banishment shall be oneyear, its longest duration shall be five years. The consent of the sentenced person is not needed for imposing this ancillary punishment. Banishment can be imposed in case of certain crimes determined by CC (such as: crimes against the state, smuggling of human beings, public nuisance, etc.) |
Type of probation measures |
Not applicable. |
Combination of sanctions or measures |
Please see that is written in case of community service work. |
Authority responsible for taking such a decision |
The court. |
Authority responsible for supervising |
Section 74 of the Act 11 of 1979 on execution of punishments and criminal measures provides: |
Authority responsible in case of infringement |
According to Government Decree No. 218/1999 (XII. 28.) on certain administrative offences: Section 15 This administrative offence falls within the scope of the police. |
In Article 4 of the Framework Decision types of probation measures and alternative sanctions are stated. Member States are asked to describe the probation measures and alternative sanctions attached to those judgements and probation decisions:
No.
Yes, in case of drug abuse crimes for drug users.
Yes.
No.
No.
No.
At present electronic monitoring is not used in Hungary, because the technical means of implementing such measure is missing. Therefore the police controls the compliance with the provisions of the home curfew and the house arrest by patrol and ad hoc control.
The Electronic Monitoring can only be used as an alternative enforcement method of two coercive measures: home curfew and house arrest. The electronic monitoring cannot be applied in the system of penal sanctions (e.g. as an alternative to imprisonment).
Member States are invited to sum up the documents that the national competent authorities need in order to take at national level a judgement and, where applicable, a probation decision (e.g. criminal record, social inquiries, medical expertise).
It depends on the concrete case. Usually the following documents are needed for taking a final decision: evidences, such as testimony of witnesses, expert opinion (including medical experts and the opinion of the probation officer, social inquiry report, pre-sentence report, etc.), testimony of the defendant. This list is not exhaustive, it can be wider or narrower, depending on the concrete case.